Teachers’ And Students’ Perspective On The Implementation Of “Kurikulum Merdeka” In English Language Learning At Upt SD Negeri 2 Sereang
Keywords:
: English Language Learning, Merdeka Curriculum, student-centered learning, Teachers’ perception, Students’ perception.Abstract
This paper explores the use .This research aims to examine the perspectives of teachers and students regarding the implementation of "Kurikulum Merdeka" in English language learning at UPT SD Negeri 2 Sereang. Using a qualitative approach, a questionnaire was distributed to 35 students from two classes: V (20 students), VI (15 students). The study utilized a questionnaire with a Likert scale to analyze the data.The findings reveal that the implementation of the “Kurikulum Merdeka” in English language learning is a promising step toward modernizing education in Indonesia. Both teachers and students appreciate its focus on engagement, flexibility, and active learning. However, practical challenges such as resource availability, time constraints, and the need for professional development hinder its full potential.
From the teachers’ perspective, Kurikulum Merdeka provides flexibility in teaching methods, encourages innovation, and promotes active participation among students. However, significant challenges hinder its effective implementation. Despite these challenges, the Kurikulum Merdeka shows promise in transforming English language education. It fosters critical thinking, creativity, and active participation among students, aligning with modern pedagogical theories. However, its effectiveness is hindered by structural issues such as limited resources, uneven teacher training, and inclusivity concerns.
References
Anggriani, S., Saputra, M., & Hadi, S. (2022). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Penggerak: Tantangan dan Peluang. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 45(2), 123-136.
Amalia, R. (2023). The Implementation of Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar in English Subject at SMPN 2 Banda Aceh: Teachers’ Perspective. Banda Aceh: Universitas Syiah Kuala Press.
Asrifan, A., & Sadapotto, A. (2023). The Implementation of Kurikulum Merdeka as The Newest Curriculum Applied at Sekolah Penggerak in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 45-58.
Aulia, M. S. (2023). Analysis of Implementation of Kurikulum Merdeka in English Learning Process at SMA Negeri 1 Palembayan. International Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 230-245.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 15(3), 10-15.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Florian, L. (2014). Inclusive pedagogy: A transformative approach. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(2), 146-163.
Gendall, P. (1998). Designing and conducting survey research. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 394-400.
Hehakaya, F., & Pollatu, G. (2022). Flexible teaching strategies in the Merdeka Curriculum. Jakarta: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Press.
Jensen, B. (2009). The impact of socio-economic status on educational achievement. Australian Educational Researcher, 36(4), 383-397.
Kohn, A. (2000). The case against standardized testing: Raising the scores, ruining the schools. Boston: Heinemann.
Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. London: SAGE Publications.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Prastowo, M. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Menengah Pertama: Evaluasi Praktis dan Tantangan di Lapangan. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 12(1), 78-92.
Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.
Rizki, A., & Fahkrunisa, N. (2022). Barriers to implementing Kurikulum Merdeka in rural schools: A teacher's perspective. Indonesian Journal of Educational Studies, 9(3), 49-62.
Rookes, P., & Willson, S. (2000). Perception: Theory, Development, and Organization. London: Routledge.
Saputra, M., & Hadi, S. (2022). The Merdeka Curriculum: A flexible approach to education reform. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia.
Schmidt, R. F., & Richards, D. (2010). Interview techniques in qualitative research. London: Routledge.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. New York, NY: Continuum.
Supriatna, S., Nurwati, L., & Firdaus, A. (2023). Teachers' Attitudes Towards Kurikulum Merdeka in Elementary Schools. Journal of Educational Policy, 15(2), 66-80.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Tricahyati, S., & Zaim, H. (2023). Challenges in implementing Kurikulum Merdeka in diverse classrooms: A teacher's perspective. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 101-115.
UNESCO. (2014). Teaching and learning for a sustainable future: A toolkit for educators. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jusfika Hamka, Andi Asrifan, Andi Sadapotto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
