Development and Experimental Evaluation of a VR Based Cooperative Learning Model for the Human Circulatory System

Hasanuddin Hasanuddin; Abd Kahar; Jong Soo Ri; Diogo  Lopes

doi:10.65224/jopate.v2i2.76

Authors

Hasanuddin Hasanuddin
hasanuddinb@gmail.com
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang, Indonesia
Abd Kahar Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang, Indonesia
Jong Soo Ri Kim Jong suk University of Education, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Diogo Lopes Universidade da Paz, Timor-Leste

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026)

Articles

Accepted February 27, 2026

Published June 28, 2026

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

Background. The human circulatory system is a complex biological topic that requires students to understand spatial structures and dynamic blood flow processes. Conventional instruction often provides limited opportunities for immersive visualization and structured collaboration.

Purpose. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a Virtual Reality Based Cooperative Circulation Learning Model (VR CCL) to improve Grade XI students’ biology learning outcomes.

Method. The study employed a research and development design based on the ADDIE model, followed by a quasi experimental pretest–posttest nonequivalent control group design. The participants were 52 students from two intact classes at a senior high school in Enrekang Regency, Indonesia. Data were collected using expert validation sheets, practicality questionnaires, observation sheets, and biology achievement tests.

Novelty. The model integrates immersive VR exploration with structured cooperative roles, group investigation, concept reconstruction, presentation, and individual evaluation.

Results. The model achieved an overall Aiken’s V coefficient of .91. Teacher and student practicality scores reached 91.50% and 88.70%, respectively. The experimental group obtained a higher posttest mean than the control group (73.76 vs. 64.52), with a significant adjusted group effect, F(1, 49) = 19.38, p < .001.

Conclusion. VR CCL was valid, practical, and effective in improving students’ learning outcomes on the human circulatory system.

Hasanuddin, H., Kahar, A., Ri, J. S., & Lopes, D. (2026). Development and Experimental Evaluation of a VR Based Cooperative Learning Model for the Human Circulatory System. Journal of Paddisengeng Technology, 2(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.65224/jopate.v2i2.76

Download Citation

Abedi, E. A. (2024). Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: Implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(4), 1215–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692 023 00296 6

Ballance, O. J. (2024). Sampling and randomisation in experimental and quasi experimental CALL studies: Issues and recommendations for design, reporting, review, and interpretation. ReCALL, 36(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000162

Bueno Vesga, J. A., Xu, X., & He, H. (2021). The Effects of Cognitive Load on Engagement in a Virtual Reality Learning Environment. 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR50410.2021.00090

Candia Véjar, A., Faúndez, Á., Rojas, C., Jeria, I., Benítez, N., Ignacia Tupper, M., Inostroza, R., Bellenger, E., & Pérez Galarce, F. (2026). The Formation of Collaborative Learning Teams in Schools Through Mathematical Optimization for Improving the Classroom Climate. IEEE Access, 14, 8250–8268. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3653114

Dahal, N., Pant, B. P., Luitel, B. C., Khadka, J., Shrestha, I. M., Manandhar, N. K., & Rajbanshi, R. (2023). Development and Evaluation of E Learning Courses: Validity, Practicality, and Effectiveness. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 17(12), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i12.40317

Desvaux, C., Abdelghani, R., Oudeyer, P. Y., & Sauzéon, H. (2026). Curiosity and Metacognition: Towards a Unified Framework for Learning and Education in the Age of AI (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2604.25648

Erwin, Degeng, M. D. K., Degeng, I. N. S., & Praherdhiono, H. (2026). The effectiveness of collaborative blended learning on mastery of instructional media concepts. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(12), 2026497. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026497

Fowler, V. G., Durack, D. T., Selton Suty, C., Athan, E., Bayer, A. S., Chamis, A. L., Dahl, A., DiBernardo, L., Durante Mangoni, E., Duval, X., Fortes, C. Q., Fosbøl, E., Hannan, M. M., Hasse, B., Hoen, B., Karchmer, A. W., Mestres, C. A., Petti, C. A., Pizzi, M. N., … Miro, J. M. (2023). The 2023 Duke International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases Criteria for Infective Endocarditis: Updating the Modified Duke Criteria. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 77(4), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad271

Guiping, P., Mokmin, N. A. M., Lijuan, N., & Zhengkai, N. (2026). Effects of desktop virtual reality on woodworking theory learning in higher art education. Discover Education, 5(1), 629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217 026 01625 4

Hamizi, M. A. A. M., & Mokmin, N. A. M. (2026). Enhancing secondary biology learning through guided and problem based virtual reality: Effects on interest, concentration, and performance. Education and Information Technologies, 31(3), 755–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639 025 13840 x

He, J., & Huang, Q. (2026). Effects of digital context shift learning tasks grounded in quantum context dependence on EFL students’ goal orientation motivation: A mixed methods inquiry. Learning and Motivation, 94, 102267.

Herliana, I., & Septiadi, J. (2026). Mobile Learning Application on PSTI Students’ Extraneous. 10(5).

Hsu, Y. T., & Lee, S. W. Y. (2026). Support for self regulated learning in immersive virtual reality – An experimental design for science learning. Education and Information Technologies, 31(1), 269–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639 025 13807 y

Huang, C. L., Luo, Y. F., Yang, S. C., Lu, C. M., & Chen, A. S. (2020). Influence of Students’ Learning Style, Sense of Presence, and Cognitive Load on Learning Outcomes in an Immersive Virtual Reality Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119867422

Jeppu, A. K., Kumar, K. A., & Sethi, A. (2023). ‘We work together as a group’: Implications of jigsaw cooperative learning. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 734. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909 023 04734 y

Khuder, B., & Negretti, R. (2026). Collaborative writing regulation: A comparative case study of co regulation and socially shared regulation in higher education. Higher Education, 91(2), 677–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734 025 01437 9

Kim, S. (2026). He Effects of Supplementary Artificial Intelligence Courseware Use on Elementary Students’ Scientific Inquiry Skills and Scientific Communication Skills. Science Education International, 37(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v37.i2.3

Koudsia, S., & Kirchner, M. (2024). Reducing Cognitive Overload for Students in Higher Education: A Course Design Case Study. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 24(10). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i10.7382

Kutluca Canbulat, A. N. K. C., Asma, B., & Üstünel, R. (2026). The Impact of Educational Virtual Reality in Prospective Teachers’ Creative Writing and Pedagogical Perceptions: An Experimental Study. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 30. https://doi.org/10.59045/nalans.2026.110

Lenkauskait?, J., Colomer, J., & Bubnys, R. (2020). Students’ Social Construction of Knowledge through Cooperative Learning. Sustainability, 12(22), 9606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229606

León García, L. F., Mendo Lázaro, S., López Ramos, V. M., & León del Barco, B. (2026). Cooperative classrooms and prosocial behavior in primary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1725692. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1725692

Mallek, F., Mazhar, T., Faisal Abbas Shah, S., Ghadi, Y. Y., & Hamam, H. (2024). A review on cultivating effective learning: Synthesizing educational theories and virtual reality for enhanced educational experiences. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e2000. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj cs.2000

Mkwama, V. (2023). THE INFLUENCE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES ON STUDENT’S ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN TANZANIA. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION HUMANITIES AND COMMERCE, 04(05), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.37602/IJREHC.2023.4518

Mudinillah, A., Kuswandi, D., Erwin, E., Sugiarni, S., Winarno, W., Annajmi, A., & Hermansah, S. (2024). Optimizing Project Based Learning in Developing 21st Century Skills: A Future Education Perspective. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(2), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n2a352

Muliana, N., Pada, A. U. T., & Nurmaliah, C. (2020). Content validity of conation assessment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742 6596/1460/1/012057

Qadeer, A. (2026). Enhancing Critical Thinking through Collaborative Learning: The Mediating Roles of Peer Interaction and Self Efficacy. Journal of Research, Innovation, and Strategies for Education (RISE), 3(2), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.70148/rise.v3i2.3

Rahman, M., Al Quadhri, & Mahfudz. (2025). Poverty Trends and Disparities in Southeast Sulawesi Province. Journal of Law, Social Science and Management, 2(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.36685/jlssm.v2i2.1552

Reinbold, S. (2013). Using the ADDIE model in designing library instruction. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 32(3), 244–256.

Risman, Genda, A., & Rajab, M. (2026). Dampak Dukungan Keluarga terhadap Keberhasilan PKBM dalam Menurunkan Angka Putus Sekolah di Kabupaten Enrekang. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 7(3), 2887–2893. https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v7i3.2320

Rizki, I. A., Suprapto, N., Saphira, H. V., Alfarizy, Y., Ramadani, R., Saputri, A. D., & Suryani, D. (2024). Cooperative model, digital game, and augmented reality based learning to enhance students critical thinking skills and learning motivation. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 1. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202423825

Schmidt, S. R., & Bohannon, J. N. (1988). In defense of the flashbulb memory hypothesis: A comment on McCloskey, Wible, and Cohen (1988).

Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611.

Sims, S., Anders, J., Inglis, M., Lortie Forgues, H., Styles, B., & Weidmann, B. (2026). Experimental education research: Rethinking why, how, and when to use random assignment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2026.2678611

Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43–69.

Sortwell, A., Gkintoni, E., Díaz García, J., Ellerton, P., Ferraz, R., & Hine, G. (2026). Beyond Cognitive Load Theory: Why Learning Needs More than Memory Management. Brain Sciences, 16(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16010109

Suhartini, R., Nurlaela, L., Wahyuningsih, U., & Prihatina, Y. I. (2021). Validity, reliability, intra rater instrument parameter teaching factory and learning outcomes of industrial clothing. 1230–1239.

Sulisworo, D., Erviana, V. Y., & Robiin, B. (2024). Application of Cognitive Load Theory in VR Development and Its Impact on Learning: A Perspective on Prior Knowledge, Learning Interest, Engagement, and Content Comprehension. JOIV?: International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 8(2), 874. https://doi.org/10.62527/joiv.8.2.2467

Wang, J., Begeny, J. C., Durling, J. M., & Newson, N. K. (2023). Adapting school?based implementation support from in?person to virtual: An experimental evaluation of a virtual coaching program to improve intervention fidelity. Psychology in the Schools, 60(10), 3961–3978.